ChatGPT in the Classroom: Opportunities and Ethical Challenges for Academic Integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/icgel.v2i2.197Keywords:
Academic Integrity, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Digital Literacy, Educational ToolAbstract
The emergence of ChatGPT and other large language models has introduced unprecedented opportunities and challenges in educational settings. This study examines the dual nature of ChatGPT's integration into classroom environments, analyzing both its potential as an educational tool and the ethical concerns it raises regarding academic integrity. Through a mixed-methods approach combining surveys, interviews, and content analysis, this research investigates how educators and students perceive and utilize ChatGPT, the implications for learning outcomes, and the effectiveness of current academic integrity policies. Results indicate that while ChatGPT offers significant pedagogical benefits including personalized learning support and enhanced accessibility, it simultaneously poses risks to traditional assessment methods and raises questions about authorship and original thought. The study proposes a framework for responsible AI integration in education that balances innovation with academic integrity, emphasizing the need for updated policies, enhanced digital literacy, and redesigned assessment strategies. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on AI in education and provide practical recommendations for educators, administrators, and policymakers navigating this transformative technology.
References
Abd-Elaal, E. S., Gamage, S. H. P. W., & Mills, J. E. (2024). Artificial intelligence in engineering education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20561
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. University of Rhode Island.
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Bewersdorff, A., Zhai, X., Roberts, J., & Nerdel, C. (2024). Myths, mis- and preconceptions of artificial intelligence: A review of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100189
Borji, A. (2023). A categorical archive of ChatGPT failures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03494. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03494
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. Department of Distance Education, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu University. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9ge8m
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. In FinTech and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development (pp. 387–409). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37776-1_16
Mogavi, R. H., Deng, C., Kim, J. J., Zhou, P., Kwon, Y. D., Metwally, A. H., ... & Huang, Y. (2024). ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters' utilization and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue.
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), Article 07. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09292. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation science learning. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 29(3), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589649
