The Effectiveness of Interactive Digital Platforms in Improving Academic Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/icgel.v2i2.201Keywords:
Academic Performance, Digital Learning, Interactive Digital Platforms, Learning Outcomes, Technology AdaptationAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of interactive digital platforms in improving student academic outcomes. The integration of digital platforms in education is becoming increasingly important, but challenges arise regarding educators' adaptation of technology. This study analyzes the effectiveness of platforms such as Kahoot and Padlet through a systematic literature review. The study identifies gaps in previous research that focused more on platform features than on learning outcomes and educator adaptation. Using a systematic literature review of 45 peer-reviewed articles (2019-2024), this study explores the relationship between platform interactivity, educator technology proficiency, and measurable academic improvement. Data analysis uses thematic coding to identify patterns in successful digital learning implementation. The results show that interactive platforms can improve academic performance by 15-25% if educators have adequate technological skills, but success rates decline without proper training. This study proposes a comprehensive framework that integrates platform effectiveness metrics with educator development strategies. Recommendations include structured technology training programs and standardized assessment protocols to measure the effectiveness of digital learning.
References
Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2021). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1634-1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1703160
Anderson, P., & Williams, R. (2021). Technology acceptance in educational settings: Understanding teacher adaptation patterns. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 512-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239521998234
Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Brown, S., Lee, J., & Davis, M. (2023). Measuring learning outcomes in digital environments: A comprehensive framework. Educational Assessment, 28(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2023.2187456
Chen, L., & Zhang, W. (2022). Gamification in digital learning: A systematic review of effectiveness factors. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 825-847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10089-3
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12796
Foster, L., & Taylor, N. (2022). Gamification elements in educational technology: Impact on student motivation and performance. Educational Psychology, 42(8), 1034-1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2067340
Hew, K. F., Jia, C., Gonda, D. E., & Bai, S. (2020). Transitioning to the “new normal” of learning in unpredictable times: Pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 159, 104–105.
Hung, M. L. (2022). Teachers’ readiness for online teaching: Examining the role of self-efficacy and digital competence. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 81–97.
Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Facilitating and bridging out-of-class and in-class learning: An interactive e-book-based flipped learning approach for math courses. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 45–59.
Ibrahim, N., Leng, C. H., & Yusof, N. (2021). Digital platforms in collaborative learning: Impacts on student achievement and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1058-1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710547
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Adapting to emergency remote teaching: Teacher strategies for sustaining student engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10662-7
Kumar, R., & Patel, S. (2023). Collaborative learning through digital platforms: Effectiveness and implementation challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00389-2
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mitchell, A., & Green, P. (2023). Professional development for digital teaching: Best practices and outcomes. Professional Development in Education, 49(3), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2189765
Mulyani, S., Habibah, I. F., Mukarom, A. M., Suja, A., & Akhirudin. (2023). Leveraging artificial intelligence to develop the presenting skills in Arabic language learning. International Conference on Education, 33–46.
Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Hilliger, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Kloos, C. D., & Rayyan, S. (2021). Using data to foster innovation and improve the quality of online teaching and learning: The case of MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.048
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Roberts, J., & Clark, H. (2021). Technology integration in STEM education: A systematic review of effectiveness studies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 678-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09912-8
Rodriguez, M., Johnson, K., & Smith, A. (2023). Student engagement in interactive digital platforms: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Computers & Education, 198, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104756
Thompson, D., & Garcia, E. (2022). Interactive learning platforms and academic achievement: Evidence from secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 1023-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13156
Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Chiang, Y. C. (2020). The effects of gamification on learning outcomes and motivation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 1–14.
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in higher education: A framework for analyzing asynchronous discussion forums. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3998
Wilson, K., & Martin, C. (2021). Digital literacy and teacher professional development: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103421
Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The impact of gamified flipped learning on student engagement and motivation in higher education. Computers & Education, 147, 103784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784
