Rekonstruksi Desain Didaktik Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Pengukuran Ditinjau dari Interaksi Sosial dan Zona Perkembangan Proksimal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62951/prosemnasipi.v2i2.181Keywords:
Didactic Design Research, Didactic Design, Measurement Learning, Social InteractionAbstract
Measurement learning is a fundamental and applicable mathematical topic in everyday life, but it often causes learning difficulties for students, especially in understanding the meaning of units, relationships between quantities, and the conceptual measurement process. These difficulties are not only caused by students' limited cognitive abilities, but also by learning designs that do not fully facilitate social interaction and student learning development. This study aims to reconstruct the contextual didactic design in measurement learning by reviewing the role of social interaction and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in the student learning process. This study uses a qualitative approach with the type of Didactic Design Research (DDR). The research stages include analysis of the initial didactic situation to identify student learning barriers, implementation of contextual didactic design in measurement learning, and retrospective analysis of student responses as a basis for reconstructing the didactic design. Data were collected through learning observations, analysis of student work results, interviews, and learning documentation. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by examining social interaction patterns, forms of scaffolding, and student movements in the Zone of Proximal Development. The results of this study indicate that understanding of measurement concepts develops through social interactions between students and between students and teachers within a meaningful learning context. Social interactions and scaffolding provided gradually can encourage students to move from actual abilities to potential abilities within the Zone of Proximal Development. Retrospective analysis indicates that reconstruction of the didactic design is necessary to refine the learning context, activity sequence, and scaffolding strategies to better align with students' learning characteristics. The reconstruction of the didactic design can reduce learning barriers and improve the quality of students' conceptual understanding in measurement learning. This research provides theoretical contributions to the study of social constructivism-based mathematics education and provides practical implications for teachers in designing measurement learning that is more responsive to social interactions and student learning development.
References
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903246483
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203520574
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007013
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
Ernest, P. (1994). Social constructivism and the psychology of mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.25.3.0286
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17–51). Routledge.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Heinemann.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., Bell, D., Gardner, S., Gardner, A., & Carraher, J. (2010). The contribution of logical reasoning to the learning of mathematics in primary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X368172
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883785
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944
Suryadi, D. (2019). Penelitian desain didaktis (Didactical Design Research) dan implementasinya. Rizqi Press.
Suryadi, D., & Rosnawati. (2021). Didactical design research in mathematics education: Learning obstacles and didactical situations. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.3.13520.379-392
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2019). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (10th ed.). Pearson.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Widjaja, W. (2013). The use of contextual problems to support mathematical learning. IndoMS Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.2.556.151-159
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




