Criminalization of Insults the President and Vice President in Indonesia

Dewi Maesyaroh; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta

doi:10.62951/prosemnasipi.v1i2.62

Authors

Dewi Maesyaroh Universitas Sebelas Maret
Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/prosemnasipi.v1i2.62

Keywords:

Criminalization of Insults President and Vice President, Freedom of Speech, Human Rights

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 about Criminal Code (KUHP), standardizes the criminalization of insults head of state Indonesia, particularly in Articles 217 to 220. The rule is considered contradictory because it can limit criticism toward the government. This study aims to examine regulations akining castigations against the President and Vice President and evaluate the impact of criminalization on freedom of expression and human rights. The research method utilized normative legal research conducted by reviewing literature and focusing on the democracy principles, freedom of speech, and civil rights. The study results show that the criminalization of offences aim the President and Vice is considered a mechanism check and conducive balance, ensuring that criticism against the President is conveyed responsibly without violating ethics, and maintaining the honor and dignity of the president. In conclusion, insulting the President provokes great consequences, in regard to the constitution, freedom of speech is not as limitless, and not absolute and must be rationated by the human rights of others. Therefore the rules concerning the criminalization of insults aim the President and Vice are suitable to maintain stability and public interest and belongs to the process of legal reform.

References

Ahmad Syaifudin Anwar, L. A. S. (2023). Menyoal pasal penghinaan presiden dalam KUHP: Antara proporsionalitas prinsip primus interpares atau kemunduran demokrasi. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM, 2(1), 18.

Aprita, S., Hj, M. H. Y., & Hasyim, S. H. (2020). Hukum dan hak asasi manusia.

Badu, M. N. (2015). Demokrasi dan Amerika Serikat. The Politics, 1(1), 9-22.

Bajammal, M. (2023). Pembatasan oleh negara yang melampaui batas: Legal opinion tentang hak kebebasan berpendapat dalam KUHP. Jakarta Selatan: Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Masyarakat Tebet.

Budiarjo, M. (2008). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Colomina, C., Sánchez Margalef, H., & Youngs, R. (2021). The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world (Vol. 1).

Cornell Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). 18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the Presidency. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871

Hutari, F. (2021). Cara Orde Baru menghukum para ‘penghina’ daripada Soeharto. alinea.id.

Khanza, F. T., & Murti, M. A. (2022). Potensi pelanggaran hak kebebasan berpendapat terhadap delik penghinaan pemerintah dalam RKUHP. Jurnal Studia Legalia, 3(01), 33–39.

Mccracken, P. (2010). Insult laws: Insulting to press freedom a guide to evolution of insult laws in 2010. Paris: World Press Freedom Committee.

Mentor, K. P. (2017). Melihat potensi ancaman kebebasan berekspresi dalam pasal-pasal RKUHP 2017. Jakarta Selatan: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR).

Prabowo, P. H. (2023). Analisis yuridis penghinaan kepala negara dalam rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Res Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 43–52.

Ramdan, A. (2021). Kontroversi delik penghinaan presiden/wakil presiden dalam RKUHP. Jurnal Yudisial, 13(2), 245.

Roberts, E. (2007). Communism, computing, and censorship. Retrieved from https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/2007-08/communism-computing-china/censorship.html

Sedler, R. A. (2006). Freedom of speech: The United States versus the rest of the world. Mich. St. L. Rev., 377-384.

Situmorang, D. A., et al. (2023). Kontroversi pencantuman pasal penghinaan terhadap presiden dan wakil presiden dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang di masyarakat. Pendidikan Sosiologi Hukum, 1(2), 118–123.

Study Smarter. (2024). Non-protected speech. Retrieved from https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/politics/civil-liberties-vs-civil-rights/non-protected-speech/

Valerian, D. (2022). Kriteria kriminalisasi: Analisis pemikiran Moeljatno, Sudarto, Theo De Roos, dan Iris Haenen. Verit Justitia, 8(2), 415–443.